EXPLORING INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL MEASURES USED BY TRADITIONAL PRACTITIONERS IN RWANDA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21010/Ajidv19n2S.8Keywords:
infection control, Infectious Disease, nosocomial infection, traditional medicine, preventionAbstract
Background: Traditional Practitioners (TPs) serve as primary healthcare providers in Rwanda, offering culturally relevant healing methods. Despite their importance, there's a lack of understanding regarding their infection prevention and control (IPC) practices.
Materials and Methods: The study conducted in-depth interviews with Traditional Practitioners (TPs) in four Rwandan districts.
Results: Four main themes emerged from 50 interviews in this study. 1) Many day-to-day traditional medicine procedures pose risks of infection to Traditional Practitioners. 2) TPs' concepts and understanding of infection are often basic and not evidence based. 3) TPs' beliefs and attitudes toward infection prevention and control may not prioritize patient-centered care. 4) TPs employ various IPC measures, including some scientifically questionable or incorrect practices.
Discussion: Challenges such as lack of formal medical training and resources hinder effective IPC practices among Traditional Practitioners (TPs). Addressing the gaps in IPC practices among Traditional Practitioners (TPs) is crucial for promoting patient safety and public health in Rwanda. Improving IPC knowledge and practices, providing comprehensive training, and institutionalizing traditional medicine are recommended. Additionally, more research is needed to support the effectiveness and safety of traditional healing practices.
References
Background: Traditional Practitioners (TPs) serve as primary healthcare providers in Rwanda, offering culturally relevant healing methods. Despite their importance, there's a lack of understanding regarding their infection prevention and control practices.
Materials and Methods: The study conducted in-depth interviews with Traditional Practitioners (TPs) in four Rwandan districts.
Results: Four main themes emerged from 50 interviews in this study. 1) Many day-to-day traditional medicine procedures pose risks of infection to Traditional Practitioners. 2) TPs' concepts and understanding of infection are often basic and not evidence based. 3) TPs' beliefs and attitudes toward infection prevention and control may not prioritize patient-centered care. 4) TPs employ various IPC measures, including some scientifically questionable or incorrect practices.
Discussion: Challenges such as lack of formal medical training and resources hinder effective IPC practices among Traditional Practitioners (TPs). Addressing the gaps in IPC practices among Traditional Practitioners (TPs) is crucial for promoting patient safety and public health in Rwanda. Improving IPC knowledge and practices, providing comprehensive training, and institutionalizing traditional medicine are recommended. Additionally, more research is needed to support the effectiveness and safety of traditional healing practices.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 African Journal of Infectious Diseases (AJID)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials. View License Deed | View Legal Code Authors can also self-archive their manuscripts immediately and enable public access from their institution's repository. This is the version that has been accepted for publication and which typically includes author-incorporated changes suggested during submission, peer review and in editor-author communications.
